Coastal Habitat Restoration - Towards Good Practice 
 
     Home • Habitats • CHaMPsGuidesSitesHow to...  
      HabitatsGrazing marshReedbedSaline lagoonSaltmarshSand & mudSand dune • Sea cliff • Shingle
        Sea cliffsManagementPressuresStatesRoutes to restorationRestoration methods

 

Heathland - pros and cons of burning

A review of the management of lowland wet heaths in West Wales (Evans 1989) suggests that burning is an important tool for restoring and managing heathlands. Amongst the advantages and disadvantages identified were the following:

Advantages Disadvantages
Post-fire open vegetation can show a dramatic increase in species diversity Difficult to predict the type of vegetation which may develop
Burning can be controlled. Best period winter/early spring Control can be difficult without small burns (requires much manpower). Need for firebreaks.
Heat treatment increases germination of ericaceous species May adversely affect other species not resistant to fire
Managed heathland with low-growing vegetation less susceptible to accidental fires Accidental firs are a constant problem
Burning provides a short term solution to scrub control, allowing follow-up management by regular rotational burning and/or grazing My increase non-heathland species at least in the short term. Does not break down purple moor-grass Molinia and provides little of the variation associated with grazing
It is non-selective Changes tend to be 'drastic'. Does not have the fine tuning opportunities given by grazing

 

Guidance: These are derived for lowland wet heath and are not specific to sea cliffs. They should be considered as providing indicative options only.

References

Evans, F. 1989. A Review of the Management of Lowland Wet Heath in Dyfed, West Wales. Contract Surveys, 42 Nature Conservancy Council.

 
Guide to colour codes 
Jargon buster 
Key reading 
site map 
top of page  
© English Nature, Environment Agency, Defra, LIFE and NERC 2003