|
Guidance - restoring saltmarsh habitat
The three saltmarsh states relevant to this section of the guide are concerned
with the status of the habitat as a whole. Changing these states is largely
a matter of reversing the erosional State
1, by encouraging the establishment of saltmarsh vegetation. Generally
saltmarshes in a state of 'dynamic equilibrium' (State
2) are likely to be managed to preserve the status quo. The guidance
associated with re-creating saltmarsh i.e. moving from State
1 to State 2 involves restoring or re-creating saltmarsh seawards
of the eroding saltmarsh edge. This is done by encouraging accretion and the
development of new pioneer saltmarsh (State
3). [Guidance for restoring degraded saltmarsh
vegetation is dealt with in a separate section].
The main routes for restorative action are shown below:
Caption:
The arrows indicate the principle routes for change: red arrows imply loss
of interest (increase in erosion in this case); green the route to restoring
this interest (promoting stability); blue arrows movement between states having
different attributes, but not necessarily representing adverse change. The green
arrows relate to the control
of Spartina, which is mainly concerned
with re-creating
open tidal mudflats.
Comment: This section of the guidance should be read in conjunction
with approaches to managed
realignment, which seeks to recreate saltmarsh to landward,
especially in areas where sea level is rising relative to the land.
|
Guidance: Spartina
control - At a few locations reversal of saltmarsh accretion may be
considered desirable (State
3 to State 2). This is usually associated with areas where
rapid colonisation takes place at the expense of open sand and mud flats,
as for example by the hybrid Spartina anglica.
|
|