Coastal Habitat Restoration - Towards Good Practice 
 
     Home • Habitats • CHaMPsGuidesSitesHow to...  
      HabitatsGrazing marshReedbedSaline lagoonSaltmarshSand & mudSand duneSea cliff • Shingle
        ShingleManagementPressuresStatesRoutes to restorationRestoration methods

 

State 4 Disturbed or Excavated shingle

Many of the larger shingle structures have suffered from major losses of the surface shingle. In this state, as the surface is excavated the structure of the shingle (ridges and lows), vegetation and associated animals is lost. There are two principle effects which depend on the level to which the excavation (or disturbance) takes place:

  1. At or above the water table

In a few cases the excavation does not reach the water table. Though the original surface shingle is lost, shingle remains the dominant substrate. At a few sites recolonisation may have taken place. This can occur both within the body of the shingle structure as well as at the edges of sites and may increase the overall biodiversity (see discussion Chapter 9.4.1 Doody 2001).

  1. Below the water table

In many cases the shingle is excavated to below the water table and open water 'gravel pits' develop. These support their own flora and fauna and restoration of the gravel surface is not normally possible.

Caption: Newly excavated gravel pits at Dungeness, Kent. A large part of these areas have subsequently become part of an extensive RSPB wetland nature reserve. Note picture was taken before the RSPB stopped selling gravel winning concessions at the site.

Comment: Although generally excavated shingle areas have a reduced value for nature conservation, there are replacement values associated with the open water gravel pits.

References

Doody, J.P. 2001. Coastal Conservation and Management: an Ecological Perspective. Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, 306 pp. Conservation Biology Series, 13

 
Guide to colour codes 
Jargon buster 
Key reading 
site map 
top of page  
© English Nature, Environment Agency, Defra, LIFE and NERC 2003