| |
Beltringharder Koog
An area of some 3,345ha was enclosed in 1987. 853ha (c16%) was reintegrated
with the sea in 1988-89 principally to make up for losses when the original
sea bank enclosed the tidal land. Two sea gates work together to produce a tidal
range of 40cms, which follow the natural tidal cycles. This replacement area
(for tidal land lost at Nordstrand),
before reintegration contained saltwater tidal lagoons and extensive fresh-water
habitats to compensate for the lost habitats.
The tidal range of the lagoons was reduced to 40 cm, which exposed only 140
ha of mud flat at low tide. Benthic invertebrates tended to occur at lower densities
here compared with the Wadden Sea. Semi-quantitative predictions of the effects
of the habitat loss were made by knowledge of the ecology of each species, the
plans for the embanked area and data from other reclaimed sites. Of the important
waterfowl that used the area prior to the reclaim, only the herbivorous species
Wigeon and Barnacle Goose showed increases in the reclaimed area and, even with
the remaining intertidal habitats, shorebirds showed a large decline. Only Redshank
used these areas for feeding at high tide and the reduction in tidal range,
reduced invertebrate densities and enclosure by tall embankments rendered the
remaining area unsuitable for shorebirds. As a result of the embankment built
to control tidal flows, the numbers of Brent Geese, Shelduck and most shorebird
species decreased in the area surrounding the embankment when compared with
pre-embankment numbers. Most species elsewhere in the German part of the Wadden
Sea increased or were stable over the same period.
|
Guidance: The results of the study concluded that "the lost
feeding opportunities due to the land claim could not be compensated in
the immediate surroundings of the study site." Taken from (Atkinson
et al. 2001).
|
References
Atkinson, P.W., Crooks, S., Grant, A. & Rehfisch, M.M.
2001.
The Success of Creation and Restoration Schemes in Producing Intertidal Habitat for Waterbirds.
English Nature Research Report, 425
English Nature.
|
|