Guidance for the Management of Coastal Vegetated Shingle 
 
     HomeThe HabitatPressuresStatesHAPManagementRestoration • Coastal Defence • LegislationMonitoringCase Studies  
      Coastal DefenceNaturalArtifical
        

 

Shingle sediment supply - a finite resource?

An important point to consider in relation to coastal defence is that many of the beach-barrier systems on the modern coast were initiated during the Holocene marine transgression and are now responding to changes in sea level, storms and tidal movement involving the reworking of an essentially finite sediment supply (Pye 2001). This poses the most significant management issue in relation to the sustainability of coastal shingle beaches and structures, especially for sea defence purposes.

The situation in Start Bay (Slapton, Annex 02) is summarised in the Futurecoast project as follows:

"There are no significant contemporary sources of material to this coastline. Landsliding in the vicinity of Brixham can occur in response to easterly storms and the removal of toe debris providing a local, although not significant, source of beach material. Toe-trimmed headland slopes fringed by some raised beach deposits are also potential sources in the north, but they are not presently significant. This indicates that the sediments present in Start Bay were derived from the seabed during the Holocene period. This is consistent with the high proportion of flint pebbles (75%), present on the barrier beaches, which have no local source." (Halcrow 2003).

A detailed study of the situation along the Channel coast (the INTERREG BERM project) suggests that new material is available in areas where sea cliffs are eroding, though even here the amounts are insufficient to maintain the beaches in situ.

General Guidance: This study has clearly identified the importance of understanding the relict nature of many of the shingle deposits that are present today. The conclusions from Futurecoast summarised in the report on Slapton (Annex 02), the continuing need for beach nourishment on the south coast and the deficit of material identified for Dungeness (Annex 05 and in the summary CHaMP report) and the situation at Cley (Annex 07) tend to confirm the view expressed in 2.1 above that in many instances engineering solutions to shingle erosion are unsustainable in the medium to long term.

References

Halcrow 2003. Futurecoast (3 CD set comprising reports and interactive map browser and two CDs with oblique aerial photography of the shoreline of England and Wales). Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Pye, K. 2001. The nature and geomorphology of coastal shingle. In: Ecology & Geomorphology of Coastal Shingle, eds.Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A.Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, 2-22.

 
Guide to colour codes 
Jargon buster 
Key reading 
site map 
top of page  
© English Nature 2003