Guidance for the Management of Coastal Vegetated Shingle 
 
     HomeThe HabitatPressuresStatesHAPManagementRestoration • Coastal Defence • LegislationMonitoringCase Studies  
      Coastal DefenceNaturalArtifical
        

 

Coastal defence index

Shingle forms a natural coastal defence. However, at many locations the supply of material to the beach is either finite or limited, with little new sediment being supplied to the systems. There is therefore a general tendency towards erosion of shingle beaches and structures. Because of this the approach to beach management in many location has favoured coastal defence, including structures and actions designed to prevent erosion, over-topping and the landward movement of shingle structures. An eroding (State 1) beach is caused by a complex set of interactions, which may include both 'natural' factors such as:

  • depletion of sediment sources (see guidance below);
  • changes in shoreline morphology;
  • changes in the pattern of waves and storms.

and human actions including:

  • excavation of the sand and gravel both offshore and in the nearshore beach environment;
  • construction of harbour breakwaters, groynes and other structures;
  • protection of eroding cliffs.

The construction of artificial coastal defences can have potentially serious implications for coastal vegetated shingle hence the following guidance is given. In addition it is importance to recognise that natural shingle beaches perform an effective natural coastal defence in their own right.

Guidance: Before embarking on any coastal defence activity on a shingle beach or structure it is important to understand the geomorphological context within which the action is proposed. There is a general view that many present day shingle structures are derived from deposits laid down during the early Holocene some 7,000 to 10,000 years ago (Pye 2001) and most systems appear to have a limited or non-existent contemporary sediment supply. As a result, unless there is significant new contemporary material being made available either from cliff retreat, river borne shingles or offshore deposits then it is likely that erosion may be inevitable. Not only are the human activities identified above likely to be unsustainable in the medium to long term, but also they may make the situation worse.

Where coastal defence structures are built then there are ways of limiting the damage to coastal vegetated shingle. Guidance is given for new schemes and mitigating damage during emergency works.

References

Pye, K. 2001. The nature and geomorphology of coastal shingle. In: Ecology & Geomorphology of Coastal Shingle, eds.Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A.Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, 2-22.

 
Guide to colour codes 
Jargon buster 
Key reading 
site map 
top of page  
© English Nature 2003