Guidance for the Management of Coastal Vegetated Shingle 
 
     HomeThe HabitatPressuresStates • HAP • ManagementRestorationCoastal DefenceLegislationMonitoringCase Studies  
      HAP1: No Net Loss2: Reduce Exploitation3: Management4: Restore
        

 

The 'Habitats' and 'Species' Directives

"The Habitats Regulations" transpose into UK law the provisions of the European Union 'Habitats' Directive and introduce stringent requirements for the conservation of Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation (including candidate SACs). Application of Regulations 48 and 49 of the regulations if strictly interpreted create a strong presumption that habitats be preserved in their present location. Only where "no alternatives" and "imperative reasons of over-riding public interest" are demonstrated is providing compensatory habitat an acceptable alternative.

However, it is the case that allowing one habitat to move landward, as would be the situation if a shingle beach is allowed to 'roll-over', could compromise the existence of other key habitats. At Cley the original realignment scheme (Annex 07) envisaged protecting some of the existing interest (mainly reedbeds for their bird interests) at the same time as allowing the 'natural' restoration of the shingle ridge following the cessation of beach reprofiling. The reconsideration of the scheme has led to the recognition that although leaving the system to reassert itself with minimal interference will lead to the loss of some habitats, others will develop. Overall it seems likely that the conservation value will be maintained and the site as a whole will remain in 'favourable condition'. A similar question has arisen at Slapton Sands (Annex 02) where the continued roll-over of the shingle beach will ultimately encroach on a coastal freshwater lagoon (designated as a SSSI and given the status of NNR) reducing its area and changing its characteristics.

General guidance - 'shingle squeeze' and the 'Habitats' Directive
From these examples it seems entirely appropriate to consider that the loss of one habitat at the expense of another is entirely in keeping with the desire to promote more 'natural' and dynamic ecosystems. The dilemma as expressed in 5.3.3 of the coastal vegetated shingle Habitat Action Plan, which identifies the need to consider the re-creation of replacement habitats elsewhere. Where these are different from the vegetated shingle and include other coastal habitats reference should be made to the Guide "Coastal Habitat Restoration, towards good practice".
 
Guide to colour codes 
Jargon buster 
Key reading 
site map 
top of page  
© English Nature 2003