| |
Developing management strategies
This study, particularly the site reviews, has highlighted the extent of management
activity already being undertaken on many important sites in Great Britain.
The ability to manage habitats and species, as well as people, within these
areas is in many instances well tried and tested. For some sites (Pagham Harbour,
Annex
03; Rye Harbour, Annex
04 and Orfordness, Annex
06) there are readily and easily accessible sources of information
on the management techniques which have been adopted. However, this study has
only been able to look at six sites (Annexes
01 - 06) due to time and cost constraints. Cley-Salthouse (Annex
07) has been included because it highlights many of the issues surrounding adopting
a limited intervention approach to coastal
defence. Culbin (Annex
09) and Spey Bay (Annex
08) were included to provide examples of a relatively untouched site
and one where regeneration of disturbed / excavated shingle has taken place,
respectively. The maps show there are many other vegetated shingle sites in
Great
Britain (there are also many more in Ireland) and a wealth of further
information to be collected and collated on management strategies.
One of the primary aims of this contract was to provide management guidance
for vegetated shingle commensurate with that available for the other primary
coastal formations namely sand dunes, saltmarshes, sea cliffs, coastal wetlands
and grazing marsh(see the Guide "Coastal Habitat
Restoration, towards good practice"). However there remain many
aspects of the management of coastal vegetated shingle that have only been covered
in a relatively superficial way.
Recommendation: In order to fill in the gaps in knowledge both geographically
and in more depth a further study should be carried out. This should look in
more detail at specific issues such as the context
within which the individual site exists and more specifically at management
issues such as grazing , significance of vegetation control in relation
to ground-nesting birds and control of recreational
activities. This should look more widely at the interplay between
the different elements of individual sites (see also for example the relationship
between plant species, vegetation structure and invertebrates).
|
|