|
Shingle restoration - letting nature take its course
Approaches to coastal management, which 'work with nature' and accept the 'naturally'
dynamic state of shingle beaches and many of the shingle structures as providing
the potential for a more cost effective approach to restoration. Letting nature
take its course relies on the recognition of two key principles, articulated
in the coastal
vegetated shingle Habitat Action Plan, namely:
- the importance of understanding the nature of the sediment
supply (including section 2.1);
- the role of natural mobility (section
2.2), which can be seen as a healing force on degraded shingle
systems.
The situation at Porlock (Annex
01) is perhaps the best illustration of the way things can develop
under more or less natural conditions. Here a natural storm breach in effect
pre-empted discussions about continuing to protect the shingle ridge through
reprofiling and beach nourishment. Today the former tidal land converted to
grazing marsh and arable land has now reverted to brackish and saltwater communities
as the tide has reinvaded the land following a breach in the shingle ridge caused
by a storm. The site was re-designated as a Site
of Special Scientific Interest following the breach, with a new description
reflecting the fact that saltmarsh and transitions to brackish water habitats
had largely replaced the coastal grazing marsh. The site shows that coastal
habitats can be re-created and that although they may be different from that
which they replace, they may be no less important.
Other considerations are relevant at this site, not least the attitude of the
local population, opposed to leaving things as they are i.e. NOT closing the
breach and reinstating the sea defence structures. The site report (Annex
01) discusses this issue also.
|
General guidance - the example of Porlock (Annex
01)
This case clearly illustrates a possible way forward when existing protection
measures are thought to be unsustainable. The lessons learned from here
should be communicated and applied more widely. This is not only because
of the nature conservation implications but also those associated with
social attitudes to 'abandoning' the land to the sea.
|
|