|
GUIDANCE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL VEGETATED SHINGLE
Introduction
Coastal vegetated shingle is a term used to describe a range of geomorphological
structures defined
by the size range of the pebbles that make them up. When conditions are favourable
for plant growth the surface can support significant areas of vegetation. Included
in this guide are both shingle beaches, which may occur as narrow, essentially
linear features and beaches and structures, which can be large features in the
coastal landscape. The extent to which vegetation
becomes established on the shingle surface helps to determine the nature conservation
value and in the context of this guide, the approach to management and restoration.
Coastal vegetated shingle is recognised as an internationally important, rare
and threatened habitat.
The world
distribution is relatively restricted, being mostly confined to the
glaciated parts of the northern and southern hemispheres. It is scarce in Europe
with the UK (especially Great
Britain) supporting a high proportion of the European resource. Elsewhere,
coastal shingle has few occurrences outside Japan and New Zealand. Coastal vegetated
shingle is listed as a priority habitat
in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and supports 9 BAP priority species.
The vegetation
is characterised by specialised plants that have adapted to survive in harsh
coastal conditions where lack of fresh water and nutrients are compounded by
fierce winds and impact by waves. Shingle habitats are also particularly important
for invertebrates
and for some breeding and roosting birds.
A number of case
studies (sites in England visited in late 2002) have been used to
augment the information. The geomorphology
and vegetation
is also described in more detailed than in the guide to "Coastal
Habitat Restoration, towards good practice". The coastal vegetated
shingle guide adopts the same format as the more general guide, information
is provided under the following headings:
Pressures
The structure
and function is extremely important to the survival of both shingle
beaches and structures and their associated plant and animal communities. They
are also crucial factors in sustaining the coastal
defence capability. Pressures
include shingle extraction and artificial
'protection' by structures, nourishment and/or reprofiling to help
sustain their coastal defence function especially in south and southeast England.
These actions are usually designed to retain the shingle beach in situ.
However, in these situations continued reprofiling, restrictions on sediment
supply (whether natural or artificial) and room in which natural movement can
take place, prevents the natural plant and animal communities typical of these
areas from developing. At the same time the cumulative effects of extraction,
development and coastal defence structures can deplete and restrict sediment
availability further exacerbating erosional trends. Offshore
aggregate extraction is also a significant issue.
Shingle structures are especially vulnerable to exploitation and disturbance.
The destruction of the surface shingle through aggregate
extraction (including the excavation for sand and gravel) is the
principle cause of loss. This has lead to major change in the biological and
geomorphological interest. Habitat
loss has also occurred as a result of building houses, power stations
and other infrastructure developments, which also destroys the surface shingle.
There are a further set of pressures from other
activities including recreational use.
States and values
Shingle beaches and structures are important geomorphological features, support
rare plant and animal communities and create conditions where other habitats,
notably saltmarshes and saline lagoons can develop. They can also often provide
significant coastal defences. The states described in this guide are defined
largely by their degree of stability:
- State
1 - eroding shingle beaches, where material is moved by tidal and
wave action. The overall trend for this state is erosional with a net loss
of material from the system;
- State
2 - stable or accreting forms tend to be associated with shingle
structures, though beaches are included where there is no net loss of material
from the system;
- State
3 - Over time the surface shingle becomes colonised by relatively
stable vegetation a wide range of plants and animals.
The resource can have considerable economic value for building material (sand
and gravel) and some of the larger deposits have been extensively exploited.
The disturbance associated with this exploitation leads to a loss of conservation
interest as the surface shingle is destroyed leading to two further damaged
states:
- State
4 - the depth of excavation is at or above the water table (note
this state in not identified as a separate state in the more general guide);
- State
5 - excavation below the water table. Although this can result
in an increase in open water (gravel pits) and the development of a sometimes
considerable bird interest, this is different from the original and sometimes
unique vegetation and associated animals which it replaces.
Management of vegetation, visitors and coastal
defence
Shingle beaches are by their nature resilient to disturbance caused
by natural events. They are formed and respond to changes in wave climate and
storms as the material moves along the shore by long-shore drift. Any vegetation
which develops tends to be short-lived or adapted to change and exposure to
saltspray. Managing specific seral stages of development (important to other
coastal habitats)
through grazing
or other forms of intervention is generally not appropriate. Controlling alien
plants and the need to protect ground-nesting
birds are special issues
Shingle structures also have a much more restricted range of traditional
forms of management
than those associated with other coastal habitats, namely sea cliffs, sand dunes,
grazing marsh and saltmarshes (dealt with in the Guide "Coastal
Habitat Restoration, towards good practice"). Agricultural use is
limited, with grazing restricted to a few larger more mature sites, which support
closed grassland or heathland communities soil
conservation may be an issue. Recreational
use is an important issue.
Coastal defence is also an important management issue for both beaches
and structures. The types of coastal
defence, structures and maintenance operations are well known. The
operations associated with coastal defence can have a serious impact on coastal
vegetated shingle at some sites and mitigation
management may be an important issue.
Restoring shingle beaches
Restoration of shingle beaches is considered from two perspectives, namely:
- Coastal defence, increasing stability Erosional to Accretional (State
1 to State 2);
- Nature conservation, increasing instability Accretional to Erosional (State
2 to State 1)
The first of these is largely concerned with maintaining the beach or structure
in its current position. Thus the control or prevention of movement is seen
as a key requirement when undertaking restoration activity usually requiring
continued maintenance, which usually prevents anything other than the most ephemeral
communities to develop.
The second may seem to be in conflict with the first. However, from a nature
conservation perspective the dynamic of a shingle beach may be important as
part of a natural
defence and can help heal areas where human exploitation has destroyed
conservation value. There is a paradox here due to the stabilising
effect of artificial structures, at least in the short to medium
term.
Restoring the surface and vegetation on shingle structures
Restoring existing mature, stable, vegetated shingle surfaces (State
4 to State 3) will be required where the surface shingle has been
excavated or otherwise disturbed. The type of restoration will depend to some
extent on whether the vegetation is near the water table and remains damp, or
not. Excavations, which result in open water gravel pits (State
5) are not considered to be re-creatable in the context of restoring
coastal vegetated shingle.
Monitoring
The guide provides some information on general monitoring methods as well as
more specific actions and needs. The more general guidance is based on the approach
being adopted in the UK by the government conservation agencies who are producing
a Common
Standards Monitoring (CSM) programme for designated sites, under
the direction of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. More information is
provided on a range of specific methodologies
or for particular elements within the ecosystem.
Legislation and funding sources
In order to aid the process of decision-making in relation to management and
restoration policy information, information is also provided on some of the
more relevant legislation.
Maps show the distribution
and location
of the main shingle sites in Great Britain (most of them designated as Sites
of Special Scientific Interest). Further information is provided
on potential funding
sources.
Publications:
- Key documents: Unlike sand dunes and saltmarshes there are not management
guides for coastal vegetated shingle. The most recent relevant publication
provides a synthesis of current knowledge of the resource from an European
Union for Coastal Conservation seminar (Packham
et al. 2001), chapters 8 and 9 (Doody
2001) deals with Shingle beaches and structures and Dungeness respectively.
Note: These and other key
reading are listed and the
Report, upon which this electronic Guide is based includes a full
bibliography of key texts and shingle related publications;
- Guides: Coastal Vegetated Shingle is one of seven habitats
included in the Guide entitled "Coastal Habitat
Restoration, towards good practice". The West Sussex Vegetated
Shingle Project has produced a good practice guide for coastal
defence engineers and others working on shingle beaches to minimise
impact to the wildlife. A full-colour, waterproof ID card has also been produced
to help on-site workers to identify the various vegetated shingle communities.
Both the Good Practice Guide and the ID Cards are available on request from
the projectofficer@pebbledash.org.uk. CIRIA
are also responsible for producing some more general guides;
- Web sites: BERM - Beach Erosion in the Rives Manche, An interim report,
final report and a bilingual summary of the final report are available to
download at: http://www.geog.sussex.ac.uk/BERM/.
Key References
Doody, J.P.
2001.
Coastal Conservation and Management: an Ecological Perspective. Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Boston, USA, 306 pp.
Conservation Biology Series, 13
Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A.
2001.
Ecology & Geomorphology of Coastal Shingle. Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, 459 pp.
|